Meet the Editor - From the Jan/Feb '06 issue of PI Magazine
An idea for my first column for the first issue of 2006 was slow
in coming, until we received two letters to the editor in response to our last
issue. We don’t have a regular column for these letters, because we don’t
receive many. (We do get regular brief emails complimenting an issue or article,
which we respond to individually with gratitude.) Please let me share the following
two letters, at each writer’s request. Each sets its own tone for sure,
but with equal interest. One is from Skipp Proteus (sherlockinvestigations.com)
in New York and the other from Bob Taylor (njsleuth.com), across the river from
Skipp in New Jersey. Sherlock and Sleuth, New York and New Jersey: the alliteration
was too good to ignore. Have a great 2006 and keep those letters coming.
| Hi Don,
I finished reading the new issue the day it arrived and
loved it, as usual. I subscribe to a dozen magazines. PI
Magazine is the only one that doesn’t have a regular
Letters to the Editor column. I think such a column would
add greatly to the importance of PI Magazine. One can learn
a lot about the influence, importance, reach, and reader
appreciation of a magazine by reading the Letters to the
Editor. The tone of a letter tells a lot. Sometimes the letters
add something valuable about a previously published article,
or correct a fact, give deserved praise to a writer, pose
a good question to a writer or the editor, or suggest a topic
not previously covered. Most of all, I think, they give the
reader the feeling that they are members of a group of people
on the same frequency. Subscribers are like members of a
club, and it’s nice to know who some of the other members
are. The vast majority of readers never write a letter to
the editor, but those who do add something very valuable
to the publication. I know you and Jimmie get a lot of feedback
from readers on your travels, but this isn’t shared
with the readers. I hope you’ll reconsider and start
a regular Letters to the Editor column.
Best regards,
Skipp |
| To the Editor:
Why is anyone in the P.I. world surprised that so many legislators
and privacy advocate groups are seeking to restrict our activities
and access to information? While the case can be legitimately
made that we perform many needed and valuable services for
the public, we have in our midst too many money hungry purveyors
of information without regard to potential consequences.
Do a simple Google search and it will return countless
links to P.I. web pages offering to find anyone for anyone.
All they want is the fee. It’s a stalkers paradise. While
we all know about the worst-case scenarios where a person winds
up dead after their address was provided by a P.I., there must
be hundreds of lesser-known cases where the person located
suffered harassment, embarrassment or simply just wanted to
be left alone.
I propose that the various state and national associations
adopt in their by-laws a provision that states no member shall
provide an individual with another person’s address without
first obtaining that person’s permission. It should further
include a provision that any member’s advertising should
express that condition or be subject to expulsion from the
organization.
I believe adoption of the above recommendation will greatly
enhance the image of our profession and result in greater
protection for the public as well.
Bob Taylor |
Thank you one and all,
Don C. Johnson, CLI, CII
You can reach the editor by email editor@pimagazine.com |